The Slightly Confused Woodworker

Home » woodworking » Revolution

Revolution


I haven’t woodworked in quite a while, therefore I haven’t written a blog post about woodworking for some time either. Yet, life can be strange sometimes, and a friend of mine I hadn’t spoken with in some time called me over the weekend. The first words out of his mouth were “Why are you reading the Anarchists Cookbook!?” I told him that I never read it. Long story short, his wife happened across a review I wrote on Amazon some time ago and misread the title. “It’s a woodworking book.” I said to him. His words after were to the effect “What the F#$% is it about?” I didn’t get into it because I didn’t care to, I had things to do.

Anyway, I don’t believe in Anarchy in any form, big or tiny. The way I look at it: I have a job; I pay taxes, I use the roads, my garbage is picked up once a week, my daughter goes to public school, I have a cell phone, my wife has a cell phone, I have internet service and cable television, I drive a car, my wife drives a car etc. Most anarchists in the woodworking sense, and maybe everywhere else, claim that they are only against big government and large corporations. I say to that: Do you send your kid to school, own a cell phone, own a computer, a car, a house, turn on a table lamp, been to a hospital, have insurance of any kind, put gas in your car, drive on a paved road, eat anything from a supermarket, turn on the water to take a shower or get a drink or cook with? Do you have internet service? Do you have cable television? Have you ever been to a library? Have you ever been to a shopping mall? Do you have electricity in your house? Do you brush your teeth? Do you wash your hair with shampoo? Have you ever taken an aspirin? Have you ever used a paper napkin? Do you drink coffee? Tea? Have you ever flown in an airplane? Have you ever called the fire department or the police department? Did you go to college? Do you own a pair of shoes? Socks? A watch? A hair brush? Have you ever purchased anything that was shipped by rail, plane, truck, or boat? Have you ever been to the Outback Steakhouse? Arby’s? Wendy’s? McDonalds? Have you ever bought dish detergent? Do you have a sink and toilet in your house? Windows? Do you have a furnace? Receptacles and wall plates? Light switches? Do you have band aids in your medicine cabinet? Do you wash your clothes in a washing machine? Do you sleep on a mattress? Have you ever eaten a banana???

I think the vast majority of Americans would answer yes to most of those questions, if not all of them. I think the vast amount of woodworkers, would-be anarchists or not, would likely answer yes to most of those questions, too. If you did answer yes to just about any one of those questions, you have either benefitted from a large government, or supported a large corporation. Now, the would-be anarchist may claim that even though he answers yes to a lot of those questions, it doesn’t mean he has to like it or agree with it, but he is forced to because big government and large corporations control everything. Maybe, but I contend that there is not one item on that short list of questions I put up that is absolutely needed for survival and nearly every one of them can be chalked up to creature comforts. You don’t need running water, or a cell phone or computer or internet service. You don’t need a washing machine or soap. In fact, it wasn’t so long ago that just about every item on that list was virtually non existent and the human race managed to go on and survive. So if you answered yes to any one of those questions you aren’t an anarchist, not even a tiny little atom sized fraction of one. Because if you did answer yes you supported a large corporation and you benefitted from the very government that you think is way too bloated and evil to do you any good.

Do governments and large organizations do some rotten things? Sure, sometimes. But so do small groups. I can start that list off with the Nazi party, or how about the Manson Family? Does one man’s really horrible idea make it any less horrible because only one person thought of it? Are only large groups capable of messing up? Maybe the larger the group the larger the mess up? Possibly, but definitely not a guarantee. Governments can be messed up, and individuals can be messed up, because the largest corporation on Earth is made up of a lot of individual people, and people are flawed, and because people are flawed every political, or non political ideology is doomed to failure. If not failure, then at least doomed to never live up to its promises.

So that’s why I’m not an anarchist, and that’s why I believe the vast majority (99.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999%) of the country aren’t anarchists either.


18 Comments

  1. Dyami says:

    Well said.

    I’m not an anarchist either.

  2. Andrew says:

    Thanks for giving me a chuckle…it is easy being a ” woodworker ” but it would take real dedication to be an anarchist. Who has the time? Or energy?

    • billlattpa says:

      I’ll just say, for all of it’s flaws, I happen to like this country and what it stands for. Thanks.
      Bill

      • Roger Davis says:

        Geez! Read the book and understand that Schwarz identifies himself as an “aesthetic anarchist.” Better yet, read “Native American Anarchism” by Eunice Minette, the source of much of Schwarz’s philosophy, and come to understand all the different ways that anarchism can be manifested. I was raised Quaker, the epitome of religious anarchism, and they certainly are not famous for blowing things up or overthrowing governments. A jingoistic tirade is not a reasonable response to Schwarz or his book.
        RD

      • billlattpa says:

        I liked the book. It’s not about the book. It’s about anyone who would make the claim but not really stand by it. Even aesthetic anarchy would require a rejection of mass production, corporations, and government programs. Right in the book Schwarz voices his dislike of all those things including religion. At that, I believe that he stands by his beliefs far more than those that just claim to do the same.

  3. edhresko says:

    Definitely a bad idea to have some sort of guiding principles or ideal that is unattainable in it’s absolute form. What a stupid concept and a waste of time. That’s why I don’t recycle…I can’t recycle everything, therefore I’d be a hypocrite if I tried suggest others should recycle.

    Lame. And hackneyed.

    • billlattpa says:

      There is nothing wrong with the concept in theory. I just don’t think it’s attainable. I have only one issue with the concept: many people claim to embrace it that in my opinion don’t actually do it. My post has nothing to do at all with liking or disliking the book or it’s author, though I can see that it could be misconstrued that way. Thanks
      Bill

  4. bonsai26 says:

    What I say about woodworking means nothing, it’s what I do with my tools that makes all the difference……

  5. We’ve talked about this on twitter, so I’ve already come out as being more anti-government than you, but still not an anarchist by any means. The point that there are different “kinds” of anarchy (e.g., anarcho-capitalist vs. anarcho-socialist) is lost on most people, I think; historically, I tend to associate them with people who blew stuff up a century or more ago. Schwarz has a blog post on anarchy stating that he “view[s] rent as theft,” which says a lot. What bugs me about his retread blog post last week is the statement

    “While I am happy to explain my outlook on life, I do it without a whiff of political language. Instead of talking about the political landscape, I’d rather live in the real one.”

    Last I checked, “anarchy” is explicitly political language, and it’s pretty inflammatory also. The “real one” statement is just mildly annoying preening. Call yourself an anarchist, by all means, and live however you want; I applaud Chris for being debt-free and living within his means, and agree (with his first blog post) that we have far too many laws and regulations [I claim that is a political statement, though].

    The anarchy term really sticks in my craw, and the fact that he keeps blogging about it makes it look like a marketing gimmick. In case any of Chris’ fans read this and tell me to get bent, I have a 1st ed. of The Anarchist’s Tool Chest, and enjoyed it for the most part. Since I already had the tools I needed, it was less useful than it might have been otherwise, but I recall it being entertaining.

    • billlattpa says:

      I read a lot of woodworking I blogs I will admit freely; it’s how I pass the time when I can’t sleep. More and more woodworking bloggers (all amateurs) are referring to themselves as ‘Anarchists’ lately. Frankly it bugs the hell out of me because from what I can tell every one of them isn’t even close to the mark, and that’s where this post was directed. Once again, a Christopher Schwarz fan that commented automatically assumed that the post was aimed at him, and it’s not even close.

      I believe in regulation to an extent, in particular when it comes to banking, safety, and trade.I don’t believe that Anarchy works on any level, including as a means of advancing the hobby of woodworking. The idea of make rather than buy is fine, and many woodworkers live that philosophy to some degree big or small. But without mass produced tools, lumber, hardware, etc woodworking as a hobby would completely die. It would not be sustainable. There are not enough small “artisan” type tool makers and lumber dealers and blacksmiths to support the hobby on even a small scale, and there never was at any time during history. As you probably well know, during the so-called golden age of woodworking there were no hobbyists. The tool makers et all supplied only to professional shops. Mass production created the hobby of woodworking and without it the hobby wouldn’t exist. That is one instance where I completely disagree with Schwarz. He puts way, way too much emphasis on what tools are being used rather than the finished piece of furniture. If a woodworker were to build a beautifully dovetailed chest using mass produced Kobalt chisels and saws from Lowes would that lessen the value or the quality of the chest? I can’t see how, but according to his philosophy it does.

      Like you, I completely believe that Anarchy is a political statement, one of the strongest in fact. And l like you, I believe that it is being used mostly as a marketing ploy. Don’t get me wrong, I think that the man lives by his philosophy as much as he can and much more than most claim to, but it is still a far cry from Thoreau. I haven’t read his last post, but I would assume that he states his dislike of churches and corporations, which he has done many times before. That’s fine with me, but I certainly wouldn’t fault a person that goes to church, or works for a big corporation, just because of those virtues. If by default when I say that I don’t believe in Anarchy I am insulting Christopher Schwarz, isn’t he by default insulting me because I believe in God and I work for a corporation? Most of his fans would say the former is true but the latter is false. That is where I have a problem not with him but his fans. Like Cronk said, maybe I just shouldn’t read what his fans write, but I’ve said before and I’ll say it again. I’m not built that way.

      Once again, for the record I will state that this post had absolutely nothing to do with Chris Schwarz, but those who falsely claim to live by his ideals. And like you, I have a 1st edition as well, signed by Schwarz. I liked the book, I just didn’t happen to agree with all of it.
      Thanks.
      Bill

      • Ha! I’ll take your word for it that the timing was coincidental; sorry I jumped to the wrong conclusion. I assume you read someone else who’d read his post at Lost Art Press.

        Whatever the philosophy, I’m thankful for the work Lost Art Press and Toolemera have done in bringing back old books and techniques. I think we can all deal with tools and wood without sounding like a bunch of college kids in a dorm arguing over philosophy.

      • dzj9 says:

        Yeah, there is a bit of tool ‘idolatry’ going on at the moment (rather than the finished product).
        A fine example is the Studley tool chest craze. Yes, I’m impressed, but I’d be much more impressed if the Smithsonian exhibited his pianos.
        A busy craftsman doesn’t have that much time to devote to his kit.

      • billlattpa says:

        I’ll have to check out the post later today. The last professional blog post I read was Peter Follansbee’s announcement that he was leaving the plantation. I have nothing against professional blogs for the most part, I just hate a lot of the comments. I probably shouldn’t even read them, but there are times I can’t help myself.

        I, too, think Lost Art Press does a great job. I haven’t been disappointed in anything I’ve purchased. I could not recommend their books enough to any woodworker, even if he or she only uses power tools.

      • billlattpa says:

        I think we can all agree that most woodworkers love their tools. I would even go as far to say that a little tool worship isn’t a bad thing. But more and more the world of woodworking media is focusing on tools and not furniture. Personally, if anybody in my family remembers me as a woodworker, I hope it is because of the furniture I’ve made and not just the fact that I had a nice tool set.

        I think even more disturbing is worship of Federal/Colonial period furniture. Once again, I think we can agree that most woodworkers certainly realize the level of quality and craftsman ship in the high end furniture of the 18th and 19th centuries. But to dismiss the Craftsman and Shaker styles because they are plainer and constructed more practically is a huge mistake. I can only speak for myself, but I don’t live in the type of home where high end Colonial period furniture would look “right”. Even if I had the talent to build a High Boy why would I? Where am I going to put it? In my great room? Therefore, I build furniture that fits in my home. Yet, many in woodworking media/pro circles consider Shaker and Craftsman furniture second or even third tier work, or not worthy of making at all.

        When I spoke before in earlier blog posts of the elitism that has taken hold in the world of woodworking, that line of thinking is part of what I had in mind. I hate to use the word ‘elitism’ because I think it is overused, but I think it fits the bill here. I can’t tell you how many blog posts/magazine articles I’ve read, written by professionals, that have subtly and sometimes not so subtly knocked Craftsman style furniture, though it is very popular among home woodworkers for the reason I listed above. I don’t think it’s the job of a woodworking magazine to throw in little insults in their articles unless they would like to perpetuate an elitist line of thinking, which quite frankly, is exactly what is happening.

        Among all of this I’ve developed a respect for Paul Sellers. Though I don’t subscribe to his website, and I’ve only seen a handful of his videos, I like the fact that he is the least pretentious “big name” out there, even though he flatly advocates a handwork only style. He does not worship tools, or any one particular style of furniture, only that you make quality furniture using what you can afford. I can get behind that line of thinking.
        Thanks.
        Bill

  6. Well, you’ll have to do a separate post on this Shaker/Craftsman thing, so I can be a dick there :-). Really gaudy baroque stuff wouldn’t fit in my house either (because I think it’s hideous), but some of the 18th/19th c. styles can, and I think this furniture-matching thing is overrated. I don’t want to build stuff that matches my knotty pine futon, because it sucks. Ditto the golden oak kitchen cabinets. The burl walnut piano isn’t bad, but I’ll never afford veneer to match it.

    So forget matching. I’ll build what I want (and can afford), providing my wife approves.

    • billlattpa says:

      If I had the right style house, I would probably build more period furniture, or at least attempt to build it. It isn’t that I don’t like the furniture, it’s the fact that many writers feel it’s the only furniture worth making. There may be people that don’t like Arts and Crafts furniture for the way it looks, to each his own, but if you like the style why wouldn’t it be worthy of making?

      I don’t necessarily care about furniture matching, meaning color, wood. But I have made all the furniture in my living room to be of a like style. For instance, my television stand, end tables, plant stand, and hall table are all of a similar style, even though I finished all of them differently. At that, I have nothing against having different forms of furniture all in one room. Other furniture I’ve made for the house is in different forms, but I had somewhat of a theme I was going for in the living room.

      But for the time being, I’m not building anything because my wife is mad at me,
      Thanks.
      Bill

Leave a Reply-I'll respond even if I don't like you.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,047 other subscribers
August 2014
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Some Posts I Like

Archives

Categories

Me and my shop helper

Top Rated

Jayargonaut

Freelance 3D-modelling, design and rendering: I am Jason Garth Edwards; a product designer and 3D visual artist with 18 years of design experience in the luxury & bespoke watch industry. I have designed watches for private individuals and corporate clients from around the world.

Katanas & Muskets

Japanese & Early American History

Twilight Tales of Tangled Thoughts

Poetry and ponderings in the twilight hour.

By Ashley Marie

Be Bold. Be Aware. Be Considerate. Be You.

TrulyAbigail

trulyabigail.wordpress.com

Vegan Book Blogger

Fascinating and engaging book reviews and encouragement you'll want to read.

Faded Houses Green

Almost Meaningful

Life of an ADHD Dog Mom

Writing about my life from dog product reviews to pet friendly hiking. As well the the process writing a book series based off of my dogs

~SecretsOfHerJournal~. Poetry and Stories

Bits and Pieces of my writing and Poetry ❤️💋🥀🧞‍♀️ Being a mother and dealing with my mental health is an experience.

Adam Fenner

Former Adventurer turned full-time Dad moonlighting as an author

Myers Fiction

Become an Author of Tomorrow

Dirty Sci-Fi Buddha

Musings and books from a grunty overthinker

Pink for Days

Parenting, books and general nonsense

Mysteries by Rose

Blog by Author C.F. Grönroos

Stewart Woodworks

Adventures in amateur weekend woodworking

THE CHRONICLES OF HISTORY

Reading Into Our Past...